Who takes part — and who doesn’t?
Octagora runs through an app. But not everyone in the neighbourhood is equally at home with a phone or computer. Some people don't trust online platforms, would rather not use Dutch as a first language, or simply aren't used to it. How do we make sure Octagora also reaches those people — not just the ones who are already digitally active?
Octagora should make extra effort to reach people who are less digitally skilled, even if that costs more time and money.
What helps most to reach everyone?
No meetups around this question yet.
From idea to action — how fast?
A good idea on Octagora has to go through several steps before anything happens with it. That's deliberate — we want to be careful. But being careful shouldn't turn into delay. What's the shortest path from a good neighbourhood idea to a visible result? How do we keep the momentum going?
It's more important that decisions are made carefully than that they're made quickly.
What motivates you most to stay active on Octagora?
No meetups around this question yet.
Equal votes, but who speaks the loudest?
Everyone has an equal vote on Octagora. But in practice it's often the same people who show up for neighbourhood initiatives — more highly educated, a bit more time, a bit more confidence that their opinion counts. That's not a criticism, it's a pattern. How do we break it? How do we make sure the tenant in social housing has as much influence as the owner of a private flat — not just on paper, but in reality?
In practice, mostly people who are already active in the neighbourhood take part on Octagora. That's a problem we need to solve.
What would help you feel more heard?
No meetups around this question yet.
No contributions submitted yet. Be the first.